ext_99226 ([identity profile] koepkeb.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] technoir 2007-02-20 07:45 pm (UTC)

None of the above should be ruled out. There are places where solar is very effective (say..Phoenix, AZ), there are places where wind is effective (er...places on top of mountains or in narrow valleys, etc), same for geothermal and nuclear. Fossil fuels have their place, too. I'm for using nuclear as a default, but those others need to be considered on a case by case basis.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting