Not really... since it's an assumption that any one of them has anything to do with Epic, at all, much less that even if they did that they were your run of the mill employees whose apparent wealth can be directly attributed to Epic's profit sharing.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Epic is bad, or anything like that... so don't feel pressured to jump to their defense. I am simply saying the proof is in the pudding, and frankly, most don't have any pudding, or have funny ideas about sharing (with lots of legalese and fine print). Epic may be great, who knows (I don't), but in the pervasive "corporate culture" that exists, today--and furthermore, as part of the gaming industry--I'd have to see it for myself, because "great" is a very rare thing, indeed. =)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-04-04 03:29 am (UTC)Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Epic is bad, or anything like that... so don't feel pressured to jump to their defense. I am simply saying the proof is in the pudding, and frankly, most don't have any pudding, or have funny ideas about sharing (with lots of legalese and fine print). Epic may be great, who knows (I don't), but in the pervasive "corporate culture" that exists, today--and furthermore, as part of the gaming industry--I'd have to see it for myself, because "great" is a very rare thing, indeed. =)