![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
To those of you who advocate not voting or don't care. To those who state their vote does not matter.
The thing is the model you have described is based on the notion that the will of the individual is irrelevant to group decisions. When the civil rights movement happened was it the act of a group which changed the political scene or the collection of individuals making a choice? The will of groups cannot work with out the individual minds making choices. Would it be better if more people paid attention to how they make their choices? Hells yeah. We can't guarantee people on mass will. All we can be responsible for is our own act of will.
One way which we can encourage people think more about their vote is to convince they have to vote. Not all of them will think about it but maybe some more will. It is moot. The important part is people take responsibility for their collective will. If everyone in the country decided Kenneth Hite should be president then he would. It is all a matter of individual will translating to group action.
Now that said, should someone divorce themselves from the exercise of their individual will in collective decisions of the people, then they believe they have divorced themselves of the weight of those decisions reached. This is a false notion. By not participating in the collective decisions then they are as responsible for the decision reached as the people who supported it. You have in fact by default agreed to those decisions whatever they may be.
Translation. If you don't vote, then you deserve what you receive and make yourself irrelevant. I am not irrelevant. I choose to vote and to exercise my will. If the rest of America votes another way then well that sucks but at least I can say I did my part. If I did not vote then my bitching about the status of things is really pointless. I got what I chose by not voting.
my .02
The thing is the model you have described is based on the notion that the will of the individual is irrelevant to group decisions. When the civil rights movement happened was it the act of a group which changed the political scene or the collection of individuals making a choice? The will of groups cannot work with out the individual minds making choices. Would it be better if more people paid attention to how they make their choices? Hells yeah. We can't guarantee people on mass will. All we can be responsible for is our own act of will.
One way which we can encourage people think more about their vote is to convince they have to vote. Not all of them will think about it but maybe some more will. It is moot. The important part is people take responsibility for their collective will. If everyone in the country decided Kenneth Hite should be president then he would. It is all a matter of individual will translating to group action.
Now that said, should someone divorce themselves from the exercise of their individual will in collective decisions of the people, then they believe they have divorced themselves of the weight of those decisions reached. This is a false notion. By not participating in the collective decisions then they are as responsible for the decision reached as the people who supported it. You have in fact by default agreed to those decisions whatever they may be.
Translation. If you don't vote, then you deserve what you receive and make yourself irrelevant. I am not irrelevant. I choose to vote and to exercise my will. If the rest of America votes another way then well that sucks but at least I can say I did my part. If I did not vote then my bitching about the status of things is really pointless. I got what I chose by not voting.
my .02
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
The thing with collective decision is they are made by individuals. The statistical models and large numbers fool us into believing that the individuals are not important but they are. Those large number collections don't happen unless the individuals make choices and vote. The individual vote has power because it is added to the whole.
You should turn over your earnings. Most votes are won by one vote. that one vote each individual in the millions make. The only time a single vote does not matter is when the system is defrauded in some manner.
Now if you want to talk about election fraud then you are standing on firmer ground. That is abhorrent to me. In those cases they are circumventing choice and that makes me angry.
As to your question, "Are you saying that people who don't like either major candidate are obliged to vote?"
My answer is still yes. In every state in the union you can write in a vote for whoever you want. There are several third party candidates. There is no excuse to not vote there. You can think of someone who you believe could be a good president. You are not restricted in anyway from voting for who your conscience says to vote for. The standard remark is "well third party votes are wasted". This is also false. They may not win as long as people believe the lie that says we only have two choices, BUT if we can convince more and more people to vote for other parties then they become more and more relevant.